<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://serenae.com/2007/04/24/clarification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://serenae.com/2007/04/24/clarification/</link>
	<description>Freelance Creativity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 08:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://serenae.com/2007/04/24/clarification/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://serena.umwblogs.org/2007/04/24/clarification/#comment-183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I highly doubt that Serena would be discussing this so extensively had it not been in our own group&#039;s FTA essay (as it also happened to be in her *section* to present on). As she also has a penchant for cheesy horror shark films (among others) she saw a perfect place and time for presenting them, as they are relevant in the precise horror film/feminist reading of a film according to Freeland. There was no invention here, to anyone who actually believes Serena constructed this age-old theory. Sorry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly doubt that Serena would be discussing this so extensively had it not been in our own group&#8217;s FTA essay (as it also happened to be in her *section* to present on). As she also has a penchant for cheesy horror shark films (among others) she saw a perfect place and time for presenting them, as they are relevant in the precise horror film/feminist reading of a film according to Freeland. There was no invention here, to anyone who actually believes Serena constructed this age-old theory. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gcampbel</title>
		<link>http://serenae.com/2007/04/24/clarification/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>gcampbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://serena.umwblogs.org/2007/04/24/clarification/#comment-182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one here invented this topic or the tradition. One of our theorists discussed a similar idea in her essay. The idea was essential to her argument, though she didn&#039;t specifically mention the &lt;em&gt;vagina dentata&lt;/em&gt; tradition (oddly, since it would have supported her point very well). In the context of our class work the idea is relevant and legitimate for discussion and analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one here invented this topic or the tradition. One of our theorists discussed a similar idea in her essay. The idea was essential to her argument, though she didn&#8217;t specifically mention the <em>vagina dentata</em> tradition (oddly, since it would have supported her point very well). In the context of our class work the idea is relevant and legitimate for discussion and analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serena</title>
		<link>http://serenae.com/2007/04/24/clarification/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Serena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://serena.umwblogs.org/2007/04/24/clarification/#comment-181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m very sorry that you feel this way. Provoking &quot;base and pointless chatter&quot;, especially about worthless topics, is never my intention. As for it not being &quot;culturally relevant or productive&quot;, I think that any theory, no matter how ludicrous, is both culturally relevant AND productive, if only for the simple fact that someone took the time to think it up.

And yes, of COURSE this is a ridiculous theory. I&#039;m not disputing that fact. We all know it&#039;s ridiculous. But that doesn&#039;t mean that it isn&#039;t worthwhile--or at least entertaining--to examine. I understand how this particular theory and our discussion of it could disgust you, but perhaps instead of arguing about whether this is &quot;pointless&quot; or not, we could discuss the ways in which the actual theory is flawed. I feel that this would be a much more productive--and academically oriented--use of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very sorry that you feel this way. Provoking &#8220;base and pointless chatter&#8221;, especially about worthless topics, is never my intention. As for it not being &#8220;culturally relevant or productive&#8221;, I think that any theory, no matter how ludicrous, is both culturally relevant AND productive, if only for the simple fact that someone took the time to think it up.</p>
<p>And yes, of COURSE this is a ridiculous theory. I&#8217;m not disputing that fact. We all know it&#8217;s ridiculous. But that doesn&#8217;t mean that it isn&#8217;t worthwhile&#8211;or at least entertaining&#8211;to examine. I understand how this particular theory and our discussion of it could disgust you, but perhaps instead of arguing about whether this is &#8220;pointless&#8221; or not, we could discuss the ways in which the actual theory is flawed. I feel that this would be a much more productive&#8211;and academically oriented&#8211;use of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://serenae.com/2007/04/24/clarification/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://serena.umwblogs.org/2007/04/24/clarification/#comment-180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no confusion.  This discussion is quickly digressing into base and pointless chatter about a topic that has been invented and blown up out of proportion.  Bravo to you and yours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no confusion.  This discussion is quickly digressing into base and pointless chatter about a topic that has been invented and blown up out of proportion.  Bravo to you and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
